Bliss Bennet. The passion of historical romance.

Bliss Bennet writes smart, edgy novels for readers who love history as much as they love romance.

  • HOME
  • BOOKS
  • BIO
  • BLOG
  • EXTRAS
  • CONTACT

Ackermann’s Fashion Plates January 1813

March 8, 2017 By BlissBennet 4 Comments

 

I’m always taken by the color words from the Regency period. “Morone” is the color for January 1813, used to describe the “Morning Walking Dress” in Plate 5. As one might surmise from the print, “morone” is a (now obsolete) variant of maroon, a “deep crimson colour,” according to the OED. In a citation from 1836, the shade is described as “the colour of the unripe mulberry.” When trimmed with spotted ermine, as the robe pelisse in this plate is, it makes me think of all those costume robes for kings that we used to dress up in as children. Do you think the combination had the same connotation of royalty for Regency fashionistas?

 

Vol. IX, no. xlix, Plate 5

 

 

Vol. IX, no. xlix, plate 6

 

Both dresses are credited to one Mrs. Gill, Cork-street, Burlington-Gardens;  for “the superior elegance” of her dresses  she “has long stood distinguished and unrivalled.” A decidedly English name, Mrs. Gill. Perhaps all the Regency novels that portray the most sought-after dressmakers as French (or as pretending to be so) do not have it quite right?

 

This month’s “Patterns of British Manufacture” are not fabrics, but rather decorative papers. The sample is difficult to see, but #4 is rice paper, “imported from the East Indies.” The OED gives 1810 as the earliest mention of “rice paper” in English, so its appearance in Ackermann’s Repository (and at Ackermann’s shop) illustrates how up to the minute the magazine was in bringing innovative goods to the attention of its fashionable readers.

The paper, which comes in multiple colors, is recommended for fashioning paper flowers, which will “possess a superior degree of delicacy, and a nearer approach to nature” when constructed from such thin, translucent paper.

 

Vol. IX, no. xlix

 

 

Filed Under: Regency History Tagged With: Ackermann, Ackermanns, Ackermmann's, clothing, dress, fashion

Comments

  1. Nancy says

    March 8, 2017 at 10:31 am

    All the peers’ coronation robes and their parliamentary robes ( two different garments) have lavish amounts of spotted ermine. The dukes wore more ermine than barons but all had some. The peeresses didn’t have parliamentary robes but could have coronation robes which would be distinguished pretty much the same way the men’s were. So, I think the regency fashion was tending more to remind people of the nobility than royalty, if anything.
    Many had a preference for French fashions but these were unavailable because of the war so English designers got into the act. Various dress makers — French or pseudo French could vary the garments for an individual look. La Belle Assemblee often had garments designed by Mrs. Bell– the owner’s wife. The magazines sometimes complained that their fashion designer hadn’t delivered as promised. Quite often the fashion leader would lead ladies off in a different direction though usually through accessories. Might be interesting to see if one can find illustrations from three different publications– by three different women– to see how they compare..

    Reply
    • Bliss Bennet says

      March 9, 2017 at 7:01 pm

      Thanks, Nancy, for the info on the peers’ robes. I’ll have to try and find a picture!

      That’s a great idea, Nancy, looking at fashion plates across different publications that appeared during the same month and year. La Belle Assemble, Ackermann’s, and what would be a good third choice?

      Reply
  2. Kadee McDonald says

    March 10, 2017 at 11:57 am

    I liked the pelisse in the marone color so much that I used it on a cover for a Valentine’s Day novella. Thanks for such an interesting article. 🙂

    Reply
    • BlissBennet says

      March 10, 2017 at 5:38 pm

      Lovely book cover, Kadee! Interesting how many traditional regency authors who are self-publishing are turning to historic prints for their covers. Do you think such prints say “traditional” more than photographs of contemporary models garbed in Regency clothes do?

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I do not want the information to be used by anybody for direct marketing purposes.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

RSS Bliss Bennet. The passion of historical romance.

  • Ackermann’s Fashion Plates January 1817
  • Ackermann’s Fashion Plates December 1816
  • Ackermann’s Fashion Plates November 1816
  • Ackermann’s Fashion Plates October 1816
  • Ackermann’s September 1816 Fashion Plates
  • Ackermann’s August 1816 Fashion Plates
  • Ackermann’s Fashion Plates July 1816
  • Ackermann’s Fashion Plates June 1816
  • Ackermann’s Fashion Plates May 1816
  • Ackermann’s Fashion Plates April 1816

Categories

  • A Lady without a Lord
  • A Man without a Mistress
  • Book Production
  • Guest Post lins
  • Rebel without a Rogue
  • Regency Curiosities
  • Regency History
  • Uncategorized
  • Writer's Life

Archives

  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
SITE NAVIGATION

Home
Books
Bio
Blog
Contact
Newsletter
Privacy Policy

TWITTERTweets by BlissBennet
SOCIAL
Bliss Bennet Facebook
Bliss Bennet Twitter
Bliss Bennet Pinterest
Bliss Bennet GoodReads